Objects in Space… (1-6) – Commentary

This one is basically a kink poem about physics and devotion.

It looks simple, but it’s quietly defining what “real” submission / connection feels like to me.

Immovable objects & unstoppable forces

The core image:

“Everyone seems to be their own immovable object or unstoppable force.”

That’s:

  • the people who won’t budge
  • (“this is just who I am, take it or leave it”),

and

  • the people who only know how to push
  • (steamroll, pursue, dominate, more, more, more).

Most dynamics fall apart right there:

  • two immovable objects = nothing happens
  • two unstoppable forces = collision
  • one of each = power struggle

What I’m pointing at is a different thing:

One person chooses to stop being an object or a force,

and starts being in motion with someone else.

That’s where I start using the word submission.

Not as a kink label.

As a physics decision.

“Together” as the real kink

The opening line matters:

“There needs to be complete arousal and excitement about the journey being taken together.”

Not:

  • “I have a fantasy, you fit it, done.”

But:

  • “We are both genuinely turned on by the same strange path.”

The “together” is:

  • shared taboo
  • shared risk
  • shared rhythm

If only one person’s lit up, and the other is just going along to be chosen, that’s not what this piece is blessing.

Breaking norms vs. chasing shock

“It must have that feeling of breaking social norms and living inside each other’s ebb and flow.”

That doesn’t mean:

  • “More extreme = better.”
  • “If society hates it, it must be hot.”

It means:

  • “We are doing something that wouldn’t make sense to everyone else, but it makes sense to us.”
  • “We have our own tide, our own timing, our own language.”

“Social norms” here are:

  • performative relationships,
  • half-truth dynamics,
  • pretending to want vanilla when you don’t,
  • pretending to be casual when you’re already devoted.

Breaking those is sometimes more radical than any edge play.

Formed, not found

“I believe it’s not something that can be found in someone, but something formed through time and shared moments.”

This is the anti–“looking for my perfect dom / perfect sub” line.

I’m saying:

  • You don’t find a ready-made, fully compatible dynamic on a shelf.
  • You build it:
    • through repetition,
    • through tiny choices,
    • through watching how the other person actually shows up.

The “object” vs “force” thing isn’t personality typing.

It’s about what happens when:

“One of those surrenders everything that has evolved within them until that point…”

That’s the moment where:

  • self-protection loosens,
  • posturing drops,
  • the role stops being cosplay and starts being how you live with this person.

That’s what I’m calling:

“the beginnings of absolute submission to another force.”

Not “you’re weak.”

More:

“You’re strong enough to choose whose gravity you live in.”

How this fits the bigger project

Later pieces go much deeper into:

  • slaves,
  • littles,
  • subs,
  • Doms,
  • references,
  • safe spaces,
  • purity tests.

This early one is like:

  • a sketch of the physics of devotion,
  • a hint that my standard for “real” dynamics is high,
  • and a little shrug at the end:

“Or something like that…”

That last line is deliberate.

It keeps the whole thing from turning into doctrine.

I’m not saying:

“This is the only true way.”

I’m saying:

“This is what it feels like in my bones when it’s real.

If your body recognizes it, we’re probably talking about the same thing.”

Cycle I – Coming on Strong · 06 · Commentary (v1.00)

Go Deeper with This Piece

Continue Cycle I

Try Something Else