If you’ve read Onward and Upward…, you’ve watched me walk straight into one of the oldest questions in the online sex / kink marketplace:
“I’m he/him. I want connection.”
“How the hell do I stand out?”
And instead of handing you a dating-app checklist, I run the question through:
- market logic,
- gender imbalance,
- and then quietly flip the value system in the last line.
What this piece is actually doing
On the surface, it looks like a throwaway musing:
- a joke about “peacocks,”
- a line about breasts vs penises as currency,
- and a closing sentence about what I would seek.
Underneath, it’s doing three things:
- Naming the skewed marketplace
There’s an asymmetry in how attention flows:- feminine-coded bodies get flooded with options,
- masculine-coded bodies are often pitching.
When I write:
“breasts are usually worth gold coins while penises might be worth a wooden nickel or two,”
I’m not whining; I’m saying:
“Let’s at least admit the starting math is not neutral.”
- Mocking surface-level competition
“Peacocks” is deliberate.Most advice for he/him people boils down to:- brighter feathers,
- louder displays,
- more “alpha” posturing.
This piece shrugs and goes:
“You can strut all you want.
You’re still one of a hundred birds yelling ‘pick me.’” - Pivoting from “How do I stand out?” to “Who is actually worth my time?”
The last line shifts the lens:“At any rate, I would seek Experience and/or Commitment to the lifestyle above all.”
That’s the quiet thesis:
- stop obsessing over how to be chosen,
- start getting ruthless about who you choose.
Breasts, coins, and wooden nickels
The “gold coins vs wooden nickel” line is provocative on purpose.
It’s saying:
- yes, visual currency exists,
- yes, some bodies get a louder starting bid,
- no, that doesn’t mean worth is fixed.
Lizard-brain math says:
“More boobs = more value.”
But actual lived experience says:
- some of the shiniest profiles are chaos underneath,
- some of the “undervalued” people are the ones who will actually show up,
- and no amount of peacocking against bad odds will fix a misaligned target.
This piece doesn’t tell you to stop wanting beauty or appeal.
It just nudges you toward:
“Okay, and after the first dopamine spike… what’s left?”
Why it ends on Experience & Commitment
The closing sentence is the real payload:
“At any rate, I would seek Experience and/or Commitment to the lifestyle above all.”
That’s me tipping my hand about what I value, especially in kink:
- Experience = not “I’ve read ten blogs,” but “I’ve lived this, learned from it, bled a little, adjusted.”
- Commitment = not “I’m obsessed this week,” but “I keep showing up even when it’s not novel.”
The subtext is:
- the marketplace can stay superficial,
- you don’t have to.
Instead of:
- “How do I make my plumage more interesting than every other he/him here?”
it becomes:
- “Who is serious about this life?”
- “Who has actually done anything beyond fantasy chat?”
- “Who treats this as more than a temporary costume?”
That shift—from performance to discernment—is what most of Cycle I is training you to do, gently and repeatedly.
Beyond the lizard brain
The tag at the end:
Musings, Beyond The Lizard Brain – RD-10086
isn’t a throwaway subtitle.
The lizard brain cares about:
- being chosen,
- being seen,
- being validated by numbers and attention.
“Beyond” is where you start asking:
- “What are their patterns like when the high wears off?”
- “Are they consistent, or only charming at the start?”
- “Do they know anything about the lifestyle beyond hashtags?”
This mini-piece is basically me tapping you on the forehead and saying:
“Yes, the visuals and imbalance are real.
No, that’s not the final metric.”
When you read it and feel a little sting as a peacock and a small spark of relief that someone is talking about experience / commitment as actual currency—
that’s exactly where it’s aimed.
Cycle I – Coming on Strong · 02 · Commentary (v1.00)
Go Deeper with This Piece
Continue Cycle I
- Previous: Cycle I – Coming on Strong · 01 · Commentary
- Next: Cycle I – Coming on Strong · 03 · Commentary
- View Cycle I: The Commentaries Index
Try Something Else