Uranus Joy (Post-Modern Sleaze)… (1-18) – Commentary

If you made it through Uranus Joy (Post-Modern Sleaze) without once thinking,

“Okay, is he serious or is this a bit?”

…then welcome to one of the most deliberate caricatures in Cycle I.

This piece is supposed to feel trashy, overblown, sleazy, and a little ridiculous.
It’s me putting on the mask of:

“hyper-sexual, anal-obsessed, cock-bragging Dom”

and turning every dial to 11 just to see who flinches and who leans in.

The cartoon Dom on purpose

The voice here is exaggerated by design:

  • “my masculine features”
  • “meek and weak”
  • “fuck meat”
  • “breed you”
  • “my hard white, circumcised, 7-inch Cock”

None of that is subtle.

This isn’t how I speak in most of my work; this is me doing a character study:

  • the guy who worships his own cock,
  • the guy who wants meek, weak, compliant bodies,
  • the guy who thinks his stamina is his entire personality.

And yet, inside the overblown sleaze, there are tells:

  • I explicitly say strong, alpha women don’t intimidate me — I engage them “as equals.”
  • I admit I don’t get off on weak men tributing to women.
  • I keep circling back to control of myself, not just others.

It reads like:

“Here’s one of the loudest stereotypes of male Dom sexuality…
and here’s how I’d inhabit it while still threading consent through the middle.”

Meek, weak, and the “type”

One of the spiciest lines in here is:

“I believe women (or those that identify as such) are most desirable when they are meek and weak to another person.”

If you pull that out of context, it’s easy to read as:

  • misogynistic,
  • regressive,
  • anti-strong-woman.

Inside the kink frame, it’s doing something more specific:

  • narrowing in on submission as a turn-on,
  • describing the state I want someone in with me, not their worth as a human.

I even say:

“These types of women do not intimidate me, in fact, it makes me want to engage with them as equals, on some level.”

It’s still rough around the edges — this is a sleaze piece — but it’s not:

“Strong women are worthless.”

It’s:

“My kink activates around a certain flavor of softness and surrender.
Outside of that, I can still meet you human-to-human.”

I’m walking that line between:

  • fantasy language: meek, weak, fuck meat
  • and real-world frame: “we’re equals until/unless we explicitly choose otherwise.”

It’s supposed to make you ask yourself:

  • “Is this gross to me?”
  • “Is this secretly hot to me?”
  • “Where do I sit with wanting to be overwhelmed / used / ruined in a chosen way?”

Cock-bragging as satire

There’s a whole stretch that reads like a bad porn profile:

  • two-hour fuck sessions,
  • anal training,
  • control of orgasms,
  • capital-C Cock,
  • Cum™ as a brand.

If this were earnest, it would just be cringe.

Inside my larger body of work, it functions more like:

“Here is the loudest version of the dude who thinks his dick is a personality.
Now watch how I slip self-awareness into it.”

Lines like:

“Otherwise, I could just pay someone to be my personal fuck doll and skip all the character development with a non-professional.”

and

“I hope I don’t sound sleazy…”

tell on themselves.

I am sleazy on purpose here. That’s the point.

But I also keep sneaking in:

  • “character development,”
  • “if you devote yourself to me long enough,”
  • “if you have one, I would love to make contact…”

Under the filth, it’s still about:

  • devotion,
  • long-term engagement,
  • mutual standards.

The sleaze is the wrapping; the spine is connection + consent.

Consent inside the “no consent” fantasy

The key paradox in the piece:

“So while it might feel like I am fucking you with no consent, rest assured, I will be making absolutely sure your consent is given.”

That is post-modern sleaze in one line:

  • the feeling of non-consent,
  • inside a container of very deliberate consent.

I’m basically saying:

  • “I want it to feel overwhelming, feral, unstoppable…”
  • “…but I’m not risking your actual autonomy or my future by skipping the talk.”

This is the kink needle I keep threading in the larger project:

  • the fantasy is dirty,
  • the scaffolding around it is sober and responsible.

I also give away my real anchor:

“I am always in complete control of myself.”

That’s the part I’m secretly more proud of than inches or stamina.

Why this lives on OnlyFans

This piece is:

  • explicit,
  • objectifying,
  • anal-heavy,
  • and intentionally over the top.

It belongs:

  • behind friction,
  • in a space where people choose to come for the unfiltered version,
  • framed by the rest of my work so it doesn’t get mistaken as my entire ethos.

On OnlyFans, a piece like this:

  • attracts the people who like this flavor of voice,
  • while still letting my other posts show the depth, ethics, and nuance underneath it.

I get to say:

“Yes, I can be this guy “in bed”.
No, I don’t live here 24/7 or build my whole life around this caricature.”

The title + track together:

  • Uranus Joy (pun fully intended),
  • “Post-Modern Sleaze” – Sneaker Pimps,

signal exactly what’s going on:

sleazy on the surface, self-aware underneath, sex-drenched but winking at itself.

On the companion track: “Post-Modern Sleaze” – Sneaker Pimps

That song choice isn’t just about the word sleaze.

It brings in:

  • late-90s trip-hop mood,
  • smoky, detached vocals,
  • a kind of stylish grime — dirty, but curated.

It fits this piece because:

  • the voice here is performing sleaze,
  • leaning into the aesthetic of:
    • “I’m bad for you,”
    • “I’m dangerous,”
    • “I’m corrupting and you like it.”

while still being:

  • controlled,
  • rhythmic,
  • deliberate.

Pairing this track with the post lets me say:

“Yes, this is filthy.
Yes, it’s also a constructed vibe, not my whole soul.”

I’m not pretending this isn’t horny.

I am signaling it’s a layer, not the foundation.

Cycle I – Coming on Strong · 18 · Commentary (v1.00)

Go Deeper with This Piece

Continue Cycle I

Try Something Else